Promptografia e a reconfiguração da agência criativa humana

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67937/30861128.2026.37

Palavras-chave:

Promptografia, IA Generativa, Aparato, Agência Criativa, Pós-Referencialidade

Resumo

A proliferação de imagens produzidas por inteligência artificial generativa criou uma lacuna conceitual, tornando o termo “fotografia” ontologicamente inadequado e precipitando debates generalizados. Este trabalho intervém ao defender o conceito de “promptografia” para definir esta nova prática sociotécnica. Argumentamos que a promptografia visual é uma modalidade pós-referencial, distinguida da fotografia não por sua estética, mas por sua gênese no comando simbólico em vez da captura indicial. Através de uma síntese crítica, analisamos a promptografia como uma prática promulgada através de um “aparato” computacional opaco, governada por uma lógica “dromológica” de aceleração que reconfigura a agência criativa. Ancorada em estudos de caso de artistas contemporâneos, nossa análise revela este fenômeno como um potente diagnóstico do momento atual, ligando a crise da epistemologia visual às pressões psicopolíticas da sociedade do desempenho. O trabalho estabelece a importância crítica desta distinção para navegar uma cultura na qual a agência humana é cada vez mais definida como um jogo estratégico jogado contra a lógica programática de máquinas inteligentes.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Gustavo Simas da Silva, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Doutorando e Mestre em Engenharia, Gestão e Mídia do Conhecimento na Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC). Graduado em Engenharia Eletrônica pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Técnico em Eletrônica pelo Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia de Santa Catarina (IFSC). Atualmente Analista de Inovação no Impact Hub Brasil, linha de trabalho em Ecossistemas de Inovação e Impacto, Gestão do Conhecimento. Tem experiência na área de Ecossistemas de Inovação e Desenvolvimento Territorial, Ecologia do Conhecimento, Cultura de Aprendizagem, Engenharia e Gestão do Conhecimento, Engenharia Eletrônica e Elétrica, com ênfase em Processamento Digital de Sinais, Áudio, Robótica, Tecnologias Assistivas, Dados. Sócio-fundador da VI Mídia, produção de conteúdo de audiodescrição, audiolivros e material acessível em áudio para público print disabled.

Vânia Ribas Ulbricht, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)

Doutora em Engenharia de Produção pela Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC).

Referências

AUDRY, Sofian; IPPOLITO, Jon. Can artificial intelligence make art without artists? Ask the viewer. In: Arts. MDPI, 2019. p. 35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/arts8010035

BARTHES, Roland. Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. Macmillan, 1981.

BAUDRILLARD, Jean. Simulacra and simulation. University of Michigan press, 1994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.9904

BENJAMIN, Walter. The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In: Aesthetics. Routledge, 2017. p. 66-69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315303673-16

BISHOP, Sophie. Algorithmic experts: Selling algorithmic lore on YouTube. Social Media+ Society, v. 6, n. 1, p. 2056305119897323, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119897323

BOEDIMAN, Eko Putra. Exploring the impact of deepfake technology on public trust and media manipulation: A scoping review. Jurnal Komunikasi, v. 19, n. 2, p. 131-152, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/komunikasi.vol19.iss2.art8

BUREACĂ, Emil; ACIOBĂNIȚEI, Iulian. A Blockchain Blockchain-based Framework for Content Provenance and Authenticity. In: 2024 16th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI). IEEE, 2024. p. 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ECAI61503.2024.10607477

BURRELL, Jenna. How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms. Big data & society, v. 3, n. 1, p. 2053951715622512, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2053951715622512

CHESNEY, Bobby; CITRON, Danielle. Deep fakes: A looming challenge for privacy, democracy, and national security. Calif. L. Rev., v. 107, p. 1753, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3213954

CHOI, Suk Kyoung. CentAIrus: the return of the centaur and the history of futures past. New Writing, v. 22, n. 2, p. 215-228, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14790726.2025.2457418

CITTON, Yves. The ecology of attention. John Wiley & Sons, 2017.

CRAWFORD, Kate. The atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. Yale University Press, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252392

DI DIO, Cinzia et al. Art made by artificial intelligence: The effect of authorship on aesthetic judgments. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, v. 19, n. 5, p. 1164, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000602

DOYLE, Sean. Augmenting intelligence with generative AI: a guide for teaching talented students. In: Practices That Promote Innovation for Talented Students. IGI Global Scientific Publishing, 2024. p. 125-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-5806-8.ch006

ELDAGSEN, Boris et al. Putting a White Box in the Black Box. ArteActa, v. 7, n. 11, p. 35-46, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62804/aa.2024.004

FERRO, Floriana; POSSATI, Luca; TADDIO, Luca. Post-phenomenology and the ethics of Artificial Intelligence: introduction. Scenari: rivista semestrale di filosofia contemporanea: 17, 2, 2022, p. 155-157, 2022.

FIGUEIREDO, Carolina; NETO, Ivan da Costa Alecrim. Aplicação da inteligência generativa na produção de imagens de sujeitos escravizados: um experimento-piloto de promptografia. Tríade: Comunicação, Cultura e Mídia, v. 12, n. 25, p. e024007-e024007, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22484/2318-5694.2024v12id5493

FLUSSER, Vilém. Into the universe of technical images. U of Minnesota press, 2011.

FLYVBJERG, Bent. Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative inquiry, v. 12, n. 2, p. 219-245, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

GERNSHEIM, Helmut. A concise history of photography. Courier Corporation, 1986.

GÜLAÇTI, İsmail Erim; KAHRAMAN, Mehmet Emin. The impact of artificial intelligence on photography and painting in the post-truth era and the issues of creativity and authorship. Medeniyet Sanat Dergisi, v. 7, n. 2, p. 243-270, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46641/medeniyetsanat.994950

HAN, Byung-Chul. The burnout society. Stanford University Press, 2015.

HOFFMAN, Benjamin. First came “spam.” now, with ai, we’ve got “slop.”. The New York Times, v. 11, 2024.

IHDE, Don. Experimental phenomenology: multistabilities. State University of New York Press, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9781438442877

JASANOFF, Sheila; KIM, Sang-Hyun (Ed.). Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power. University of Chicago Press, 2019.

KAMRAN, Areeba. Decolonizing Artificial Intelligence: Unveiling Biases, Power Dynamics, and Colonial Continuities in AI Systems. RMS journal, 2023.

KASPAROV, Garry. The chess master and the computer. The New York Review of Books, v. 57, n. 2, p. 16-19, 2010.

KITTLER, Friedrich A. Gramophone, film, typewriter. Stanford University Press, 1999.

LEE, Jimmy. Human Intentionality Meets Algorithmic Reproduction: Interpreting AI-Generated Image. In: International Conference of Art, Design & Technology. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2024. p. 419-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-4341-7_39

MACHAMER, Peter; WOLTERS, Gereon (Ed.). Science Values and Objectivity. University of Pittsburgh Pre, 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt5vkg7t

MANKEKAR, Purnima. Genealogies of Knowledge Production: Information, Data, and Algorithmic World-Making. Critical AI, v. 3, n. 1, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/2834703X-11700264

MANOVICH, Lev. AI aesthetics. Moscow: Strelka Press, 2018.

MEYER, Roland. “Platform Realism”. AI Image Synthesis and the Rise of Generic Visual Content. Transbordeur. Photographie histoire société, n. 9, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/13dwq

MUN, Su Jin; CHOI, Won Ho. Artificial Intelligence in Neoplasticism: Aesthetic Evaluation and Creative Potential. Computers, v. 14, n. 4, p. 130, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14040130

NASAKTI, Ghazali Hasan; DIRKARESHZA, Rianda. Generative artificial intelligence is not a mere tool: Revisiting Indonesian Copyright Law. The Journal of World Intellectual Property, v. 28, n. 2, p. 344-374, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jwip.12335

NEWHALL, Beaumont. The history of photography. New York: Museum of modern art, 1982.

OKSANEN, Atte et al. Artificial intelligence in fine arts: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, v. 1, n. 2, p. 100004, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2023.100004

PARESCHI, Remo. Centaur Art: The Future of Art in the Age of Generative AI. 1. ed. Cham: Springer, 2024. E-book (978-3-031-69063-1). DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-69063-1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69063-1_1

PARK, Sungjin. The work of art in the age of generative AI: aura, liberation, and democratization. AI & society, v. 40, n. 3, p. 1807-1816, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-01948-6

PEIRCE, Charles Sanders. The essential peirce, volume 2: Selected philosophical writings (1893-1913). Indiana University Press, 1992.

PEREIRA, Max Augusto Franco; OLIVEIRA, Advanusia; VIANA, Lindiney. A DROMOCRACIA CIBERCULTURAL E AS REVOLUÇÕES GÊMEAS DA TECNOLOGIA: implicações sociotécnicas e políticas nas sociedades contemporâneas. II Encontro Regional Norte-Nordeste da ABCiber, n. 1, 2019.

PFAFF, Natalie. “The Divine Irreference of Images”: From Husserl's Image Object to Baudrillard's Simulacrum. In: Husserl on Depiction. Routledge, 2025. p. 353-369. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380122-26

POCOCK, Jennifer. SLOP or GO?. ASEE Prism, v. 33, n. 2, p. 10-11, 2023.

RITCHIN, Fred. After photography. WW Norton & Company, 2009.

ROSA, Hartmut. Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. Columbia University Press, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/rosa14834

SAG, Matthew. Copyright safety for generative AI. Hous. L. Rev., v. 61, p. 295, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4438593

SAMUELSON, Pamela. Generative AI meets copyright. Science, v. 381, n. 6654, p. 158-161, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adi0656

SARVAS, Risto; FROHLICH, David M. The Kodak Path (ca. 1888–1990s). In: From Snapshots to Social Media-The Changing Picture of Domestic Photography. London: Springer London, 2011. p. 47-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-247-6_4

SCHELENZ, Laura. Artificial intelligence between oppression and resistance: black feminist perspectives on emerging technologies. In: Artificial intelligence and its discontents: critiques from the social sciences and humanities. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. p. 225-249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88615-8_11

SCHILLACI, Zachary. LLM adoption trends and associated risks. In: Large Language Models in Cybersecurity: Threats, Exposure and Mitigation. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. p. 121-128. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54827-7_13

SPENCER, Amy. Writing with technologies: reimagining the author. In: Conference on Artificial Creativity: Looking at the Future of Digital Culture. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024. p. 59-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-88334-7_6

TAYLOR, Ross. Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on the Ethical Bounds and Practice of Photojournalism. Visual Communication Quarterly, n. just-accepted, p. 1-50, 2025.

THIELE, Leslie Paul. Human Agency, Artificial Intelligence, and the Attention Economy. Springer Nature Switzerland, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-82086-1

TIRPAN, Esra Cengiz. The ethical issues in generative artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, v. 12, n. 4, p. 729-747, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v12i4.2431

VIRILIO, Paul. Speed and politics: An essay on dromology, trans. M. Polizzotti. New York: Semiotext (e), 1986.

WASIELEWSKI, Amanda. Unnatural Images: On AI-Generated Photographs. Critical Inquiry, v. 51, n. 1, p. 1-29, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/731729

XU, Rui; HSU, Yen; WANG, Xinyan. Examining Artificial Intelligence Anxiety in the Context of Anthropocentrism and the Art Turing Test. Empirical Studies of the Arts, p. 02762374251353671, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/02762374251353671

YIN, Robert K. Case study research and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2018.

ZIA, Samavia. Digital Colonialism: Reimagining Power, Identity, and Resistance by Decolonizing AI. Yayasan Drestanta Pelita Indonesia, p. 129-147, 2025.

ZUBOFF, Shoshana. Surveillance capitalism and the challenge of collective action. In: New labor forum. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications, 2019. p. 10-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1095796018819461

ZYLINSKA, Joanna. AI art: machine visions and warped dreams. Open humanities press, 2020.

Publicado

2026-08-06

Como Citar

SIMAS DA SILVA, Gustavo; ULBRICHT, Vânia Ribas. Promptografia e a reconfiguração da agência criativa humana. Revista Brasileira de Estudos CTS, Brasil, v. 1, n. 3, p. 38–59, 2026. DOI: 10.67937/30861128.2026.37. Disponível em: https://revistabrasileiradeestudoscts.com/revista/article/view/37. Acesso em: 21 set. 2026.

Edição

Seção

ARTIGOS

Artigos Semelhantes

1 2 > >> 

Você também pode iniciar uma pesquisa avançada por similaridade para este artigo.